Drug Court System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

do drugs motor inn System - Essay ExampleHence, the introduction of various criminal justice designs to achieve this goal (James Ernest Lessenger, 2007, p. 126). The program we focus on is the dose court system. Drug courts can be described as judicially monitored court dockets, whose aim is to handle cases involving non-violent substance abuse offenders chthonian the juvenile, adult, tribal and family justice systems. These courts operate under a unique model where the defense, prosecution, law enforcement, social service, probation and the judiciary work as wiz to dish offenders recover and become valuable citizens. Drug courts were formed in 1989 when Miami-Dade County officials formulated a thorough, community based, rehabilitation, treatment, and supervisory program for medicate defendants who were non-violent, to deal with increasing recidivism rates. These exceptional courts were established to incorporate treatment of drug fusss into the Statess criminal justice syste m, handling offenders with drug abuse history for their addiction, and at the same era ensuring supervision, and sanctions where necessary, from these courts (OHear, 2009, p. 105). The need for these courts in sentencing drug offenders arose from the dawning reality that Americas method in combating drug abuse by law enforcement strategies continued to cause a significant challenge for the countrys criminal court system. Drug related crime has continuously been an enormous burden for the American society, one whereby supply reduction techniques pass unsuccessfully eliminated. Since 1989, these courts have scattered throughout America, and their movement has reflected the desire to commute the focus from attempting to address drug crimes by cutting off their supply, to combating drug demand through addiction treatment. Drug courts have used criminal justice system to combat drug addictions by an compound set of legal and social services instead of dependence on sanctions through probation or captivity (OHear, 2009, p. 128). Drug courts have achieved success, the principal one being recidivism reduction when offenders argon in the program and after. Drug courts are centered on close monitoring of offenders, with increased drug testing. These courts generate savings overdue to reduced prison time, reduce criminal justice expenses and reduce criminality. Offenders who have passed through this program have reduced recidivism rates than those who have not. Drug courts have demonstrated the feasibility of hiring a team based, problem solving strategy to adjudicating drug offenders in a manner that improves public safety, and criminal behavior is similarly reduced tremendously when offenders participate in this program (David W. Neubauer, 2010, p. 284). Several components describe the operational procedure of Drug courts, but with variation on the population of the defendant background and legal issues. In their legal framework, on that point are two Drug cou rt models post adjudication programs and deferred prosecution programs. In deferred prosecution, defendants who meet particular capacity requirements are directed towards Drug court system before pleading to a particular charge. They are expected not to plead guilty, and the ones who complete the program are not prosecuted any further, but mischance to finish the program leads to prosecution. In post adjudication, defendants are supposed to plead guilty, but their